Tenet A weekly Commentary on Politics, People and Policy
By Dale Bourdette
Published week of November 20, 1999
Winter Haven News Chief
Elected vs Appointed
Our school superintendent, Glenn Reynolds caught the Board
and us off guard by announcing his retirement at the end of the term.
He will not run for reelection. The
race begins. Several people have already thought about running but I might
suggest the perfect candidate.
Who is this candidate?
He is a bright young school superintendent in a small school system that
has shown his metal, gained experience and is ready for something bigger and a
large challenger. In him we have
seen the ability to work with a school board to work out difficult problems.
The school system he leads has shown a solid increase in test scores and
has steadily lowered the drop out rate. He
is clearly ready for a larger challenge and would be the perfect candidate for
Polk County.
Who is this candidate?
I have taken a little literary license.
He is a figment of my imagination but it really doesn’t matter.
He would not come to Polk County anyway.
To do so would mean quitting his job, come live in Polk County and
campaign for the office, because we
have an elected, not appointed Superintendent.
He will take his bright shining star to another school system and build
on what he as accomplished and that system will benefit.
Polk County loses. He has
too many other choices… choices where they have an appointed Superintendent.
Since we elect, not appoint, we will be limited to
those that live here and are willing to take the months to campaign for the
position. We will be limited to
those, most likely, who have never had experience as a School Superintendent.
We will probably be limited to those currently in the school system.
If we were to have an appointed school superintendent
by the school board it would open up the position to a much wider audience, we
could attract more candidates and most likely better candidates than we do now.
This is not to say that the current or potential
candidates will not fill the bill. If
they were examined against the qualification of all candidates we would truly
have the best candidate, not the best candidate from a very restricted field.
I know that it has been tried before (to change from
elected to appointed) and failed. But
it truly is an idea that will benefit Polk County and our children.
Can you imagine a private business filling a position
of this magnitude this way? We are
asking a candidate to lead a system with a budget of over $600 million, with
more than 100 schools, serving over 80,000 students.
For this position we are willing to settle for someone who has no
experience? If we were a small
school system in Iowa we might have settle for less.
But we are big. (One of the largest school systems in the country) We are
Florida and could command the best! But
because we elect, not appoint, we settle for less and shortchange our children
and our future!
The elected superintendent gables up the line of
authority. If the board appointed,
we could hold them responsible for his performance and we can vote on these
people. We would still have the
election process (to elect school board members), but we would have a clear line
or authority and responsibility…. AND we would select a superintendent from a
field of candidates with experience in the job, we would have more to choose
from… and in the end we would get a better superintendent with better results
and a brighter future.
An elected school superintendent is a relic of the
past and is hindering the improvement of our school system
|